Yuliana Mendez
Yuliana Mendez
Senior Manager, Capital Projects
As demand for sterile injectables continues to grow, pharmaceutical manufacturers face mounting pressure to increase capacity without sacrificing quality, flexibility, or reliability. New facilities must be designed to accommodate increasingly complex products, evolving regulatory expectations, and the realities of operating at commercial scale.
In this Q&A, Yuliana Mendez shares her perspective overseeing the execution of a major sterile injectable manufacturing expansion and discusses the factors that contribute to successful facility development, operational readiness, and long-term manufacturing resilience.
Why is facility design becoming increasingly important in sterile injectable manufacturing?
Historically, many pharmaceutical facilities were designed around a specific process or product. Today, manufacturers are supporting a much broader range of therapies, delivery formats, and production volumes, requiring facilities that can adapt to changing demands over time.
As a result, the focus has shifted from simply creating manufacturing space to developing facilities that are inherently flexible, scalable, and operationally resilient. Decisions made early in a project can significantly impact manufacturing efficiency, product quality, technology transfer activities, and future expansion opportunities.
The most successful facilities are designed not only to address immediate needs, but also to accommodate future products, technologies, and manufacturing requirements.
What are the most important considerations when planning a modern sterile manufacturing facility?
Flexibility should be one of the primary objectives.
Modern facilities increasingly utilize segregated manufacturing suites, dedicated formulation areas, flexible utility systems, and layouts that support multiple manufacturing strategies. These design principles allow a facility to accommodate a broader range of products while minimizing operational constraints.
Equally important is process flow. Personnel, materials, equipment, and waste streams must move through the facility efficiently while maintaining GMP compliance and contamination control. The most effective facilities create a natural operational flow that supports both productivity and quality.
Why are utilities often considered the foundation of a successful facility?
While filling lines and manufacturing suites often receive the most attention, the supporting infrastructure ultimately determines the reliability of a facility.
Manufacturing performance depends on systems such as purified water, Water for Injection (WFI), clean steam, HVAC, power generation, compressed gases, and cooling systems. If those systems are not properly planned, they can create operational bottlenecks regardless of how advanced the manufacturing equipment may be.
Organizations today place significant emphasis on redundancy, maintainability, and long-term reliability. Concepts such as N+1 design, redundant utility feeds, backup power systems, and dedicated utility distribution help ensure business continuity and reduce the risk of production interruptions.
How has the industry’s approach to manufacturing resilience evolved?
In the past, resilience was often viewed primarily through the lens of quality and compliance. Today, resilience extends across every aspect of facility planning and operations.
Manufacturers must consider how a facility will respond to utility failures, maintenance activities, supply disruptions, weather events, and future capacity demands. True resilience requires systems that can continue operating under a variety of conditions without compromising product quality or production schedules.
This has led to increased investment in redundant infrastructure, flexible manufacturing configurations, and utility systems capable of supporting continuous operations. Business continuity is increasingly becoming a core requirement rather than a secondary consideration.
What role does equipment selection play in long-term manufacturing performance?
Equipment selection extends far beyond throughput specifications.
When evaluating filling, formulation, lyophilization, and support equipment, organizations must consider maintainability, reliability, operator interaction, cleaning requirements, scalability, and future program flexibility. The long-term effectiveness of any manufacturing line is heavily influenced by the quality of the initial user requirements and the rigor applied during equipment evaluation and selection.
Successful projects also depend on collaboration across operations, quality, project management, manufacturing teams, equipment suppliers, and end users. Incorporating diverse perspectives early in the planning process helps identify potential challenges before equipment installation begins and ensures systems are fit for purpose.
How are advances in manufacturing technologies influencing facility development?
New technologies are creating opportunities to improve both operational efficiency and manufacturing flexibility.
High-speed isolator-based filling systems, automated inspection technologies, integrated reject mechanisms, advanced lyophilization platforms, and enhanced automation capabilities are allowing facilities to increase productivity while maintaining strict sterility assurance requirements.
For example, advances in lyophilization technology, including controlled nucleation approaches, have demonstrated the potential to improve process consistency and support more predictable manufacturing outcomes. Similarly, isolator-based filling technologies continue to strengthen contamination control while enabling higher throughput operations.
The challenge for organizations is ensuring these technologies are integrated effectively into the overall manufacturing strategy and support the facility’s long-term operating objectives.
What lessons can the industry learn from large-scale pharmaceutical expansion projects?
One of the biggest lessons is that speed and quality do not have to be competing objectives.
Successful expansion projects require strong project governance, early stakeholder engagement, disciplined execution, and open communication among all project participants. Increasingly, organizations are adopting more agile project execution strategies that allow design, procurement, construction, and validation activities to progress in parallel while maintaining appropriate risk management.
Equally important is collaboration beyond the facility itself. Utility providers, equipment manufacturers, construction partners, regulatory agencies, and local communities all influence project success. Organizations that invest in these relationships early often experience smoother execution and fewer delays.
How do you see sterile manufacturing facilities evolving over the next decade?
Future facilities will likely become more flexible, more digital, and more integrated.
Organizations will continue to focus on modular facility design, advanced automation, digital asset management, predictive maintenance strategies, and infrastructure capable of supporting increasingly complex therapies. Sustainability will also play a larger role as manufacturers seek to reduce energy consumption, optimize utility utilization, and improve operational efficiency.
Above all, future facilities will continue to evolve around one central objective: creating manufacturing environments capable of delivering high-quality therapies reliably, efficiently, and at scale.
As therapeutic complexity continues to increase, the ability to successfully plan, execute, and operationalize new manufacturing capacity will become an increasingly important differentiator for the industry.